You might want to take a page from some of the largest corporations’ playbooks when it comes to dealing with cloud backups.
A notable tech writer from The Wired, Mat Honan, had his greatest dream come true about a decade ago. His practically complete digital footprint was erased, including material on his iPhone, iPad, and MacBook Pro. His over a year’s worth of personal memories, including photos of his daughter, were also erased. Honan’s Twitter, Google, and iCloud accounts were all targeted and finally infiltrated by hackers to access his prized Twitter account.
Like many of us, Honan depended on the cloud to back up his personal and professional data, the majority of which was destroyed in the tragedy. Despite this, many companies continue to think that simply being in the cloud means that our backups are automatically taken care of by the cloud provider.
However, in recent years, hackers have targeted backups, which might make recovering from a security event even more difficult if a suitable backup plan is not implemented.
Should you rely on cloud backup and recovery services?
Backup and recovery are two of the most popular use cases for cloud adoption. They give a dependable destination away from production data centres to safeguard and protect the organization’s data.
With data being an organization’s lifeline, data backup and recovery remains one of the top priorities for CIOs. Organizations frequently believe that cloud providers are entirely responsible for maintaining a backup. In actuality, nothing could be further from the truth. Backups are the shared obligation of an organization and its Cloud Service Provider (CSP) to guarantee minimum business impact in the event of a failure.
Just because you’re storing your data on the cloud doesn’t ensure you’ll be able to restore it in the event of a disaster or data loss. CSPs give complete protection against hardware and network failure, but not against data corruption caused by human mistakes or application corruption. Every company should have a recovery strategy to restore data if it becomes corrupted, damaged, or lost.
Some businesses might not wholly rely on their cloud provider. They feel that organizations need to take the required safeguards to guarantee that data is available at a local data centre or another reputable cloud provider.
Recovery from a data loss will always be challenging if we rely on cloud providers since most of them rely on image backup rather than particular business data backup, which enterprises require. Other data storage, privacy, and security assurance issues might provide a hurdle.
Happiest Mind Technology, for example, employs a hybrid backup and recovery technique. While most of the solutions are cloud-based, the company also offers on-premise and legacy solutions within the data centre.
Data backup techniques face new challenges.
Backup and recovery are among the essential network applications; they touch every significant piece of information worth protecting, spanning data centres and clouds that transfer the most data. The most challenging obstacle in data protection is the afterthought. As a result, fewer resources, less preparation, and less time to complete the job. Data adds value to a business, but it may detract from that value and much more if not safeguarded. As a result, careful consideration should be made while developing the project and securing the data using an application strategy, whether on-premises or in the cloud.
Data integrity, data recovery testing and data recovery for specific instances, capacity planning, and the risk of data corruption in the backup model are the most difficult obstacles in deploying a backup and data recovery system.
Recovery from tape backups might be time-consuming. The process of identifying, loading, and restoring cassettes can be time-consuming.
The reasons for abandoning a tape-based backup system were:
-
- Tape rotation and retention.
-
- Tape management.
-
- Time to restore (in certain circumstances, businesses had to transport the tape back to the Data Center to restore data, with an average turnaround time of three days).
Legacy solution modernization:
With some backup and recovery systems dating back decades, IT executives must examine legacy backup and recovery solutions overtime to stay up with the pace of modernization.
The legacy tools were created when workloads and applications were very different, and the tools available at the time were a good match. The backup scope, RPOs, and RTOs for data recovery; the implementation of appropriate solutions; the provisioning of storage or the combination of various repositories; and the execution and monitoring of backups.
Legacy backup and recovery solutions are limited in supporting current IT infrastructures. As a result, data protection should be ubiquitous, assured, and not interfere with user experience, which is only feasible through integration with new platforms and legacy.
Most firms, however, find it difficult to transition away from a historical backup and recovery system.
This is due to the process that has already been established, people who have been recruited for the specific position and purpose. In most situations, the IT infrastructure cost has already been invested in the legacy system, with the only ongoing cost being the labour cost. Because of the simplicity and comfort that contemporary technology solutions bring, IT leaders will eventually have to shift away from outdated systems.
